Cover Calculations and Buying Checklists

Human life value (HLV) calculation for term insurance: a step-by-step worked example

Work out your human life value for term insurance in India using income, personal spending, salary growth and a discount rate, with the formula and a sensitivity table.

Updated · 5 min read

Human life value (HLV) calculation for term insurance: a step-by-step worked example

Human life value (HLV) is the present value of the income you would bring to your family over the rest of your working life, after tax and after what you spend on yourself. For term insurance, it answers the question: "What lump sum, invested today, would replace what my family would have received from me?" The calculation needs five inputs: your yearly contribution to the family, the years until retirement, expected salary growth, a discount rate (the return the family could earn), and existing assets and cover to subtract. In the worked example below, a 32-year-old contributing ₹10 lakh a year has an HLV of about ₹2.04 crore, and a reasonable term cover of about ₹1.8 crore after existing savings.

This guide belongs to the cover amount guide, which also explains the simpler expense method.

The inputs

InputMeaningExample (illustrative)
Take-home incomeYearly income after income tax and your own provident fund contribution₹13,00,000
Personal consumptionWhat you spend on yourself: commute, phone, clothes, personal costs₹3,00,000
Yearly contribution (C)Take-home minus personal consumption₹10,00,000
Years to retirement (n)From now until you stop earning60 − 32 = 28
Salary growth (g)Average yearly growth of the contribution6%
Discount rate (r)Return the family could earn on the lump sum8%

The formula

The contribution grows each year, and each future year's money is worth less today. The present value of a growing series of yearly amounts is:

HLV = C × [1 − ((1 + g) ÷ (1 + r))ⁿ] ÷ (r − g)

This assumes the first contribution is received at the end of the first year and that r is greater than g. If r equals g, the formula becomes simply C × n ÷ (1 + r).

Working it through

  1. Growth relative to discount: 1.06 ÷ 1.08 = 0.98148.
  2. Raise to the power of 28 years: 0.98148²⁸ ≈ 0.5925.
  3. Subtract from 1: 1 − 0.5925 = 0.4075.
  4. Divide by (r − g) = 0.08 − 0.06 = 0.02: 0.4075 ÷ 0.02 ≈ 20.37.
  5. Multiply by C: 20.37 × ₹10,00,000 ≈ ₹2.04 crore.

So the family's future income from you is worth about ₹2.04 crore in today's money, under these assumptions.

From HLV to the cover you buy

StepAmount
Human life value₹2,04,00,000
Less: existing life cover you own (an old endowment policy)₹10,00,000
Less: savings and investments the family could use₹15,00,000
Additional term cover suggested₹1,79,00,000

Should you add your home loan to HLV? Usually not, because the EMIs are paid out of the contribution you counted. If the loan is large compared with income and you want it cleared immediately so the family has no EMI, add the loan balance and check that you are not double counting. Employer group cover is usually not subtracted, because it stops when you leave the job.

How sensitive is HLV to the assumptions?

Small changes in growth and discount rate move the answer a lot. All rows use C = ₹10 lakh.

ScenarioYearsGrowthDiscountHLV
Base case286%8%about ₹2.04 crore
Lower return for the family286%7%about ₹2.31 crore
Cautious: lower growth, higher return285%9%about ₹1.62 crore
No salary growth280%8%about ₹1.11 crore
Starting at 40 instead of 32206%8%about ₹1.56 crore

Two lessons from the table:

  • The gap between growth and discount (r − g) matters more than either number. Use a discount rate your family could realistically earn on safe investments after tax, not an optimistic equity return.
  • HLV falls as you get older because fewer earning years remain. Your cover need usually falls too, which is why a term plan ending at 60 is often enough, and why some people layer two policies: a larger one ending when children are independent and a smaller one to 60 or 65.

HLV vs the expense method

Human life valueExpense method
Starts fromYour incomeYour family's spending
Best forYounger earners with rising incomesFamilies with clear budgets and goals
WeaknessSensitive to growth and discount assumptionsMay miss goals or underestimate future spending
Typical useUpper bound of sensible coverMinimum needed to keep the family's lifestyle

If both methods give similar results, you have a robust figure. If HLV is much higher, the family's lifestyle may be lower than your income could support, and the expense figure is a reasonable minimum. You can test the expense figure in the life cover calculator, then compare term quotes for the result.

Mistakes in HLV calculations

  • Using gross salary instead of take-home after tax.
  • Forgetting to remove personal consumption, which inflates the result.
  • Using a discount rate of 12% or more because markets have done well: this shrinks HLV and leaves the family under-covered.
  • Assuming retirement at 70 when your job or health may not allow it.
  • Not revisiting HLV after a big promotion or a career change.

Online HLV calculators on insurers' websites use their own assumptions. Look at the inputs they assume before trusting the figure. Insurers also cap cover by income and age, so the HLV figure can exceed what you are allowed to buy; see the premium factors guide.

If your HLV falls steeply with age, a two-policy layered structure can match cover to the need; the policy term and payout options guide works through an example.

Frequently asked questions

Is HLV used by insurers to decide my cover?

Insurers use income-based limits that work in a similar spirit, but their own underwriting rules decide the maximum cover. Your HLV is a planning figure for you.

What if I am self-employed with uneven income?

Use an average of the last three years of income from your returns, and a cautious growth rate. Add business loans that you have personally guaranteed.

Should I include future bonuses and increments?

Use the growth rate for increments. Include variable pay only if it is reliable, or use a lower growth rate.

Sources

Related guides